trains achieve 500 ton-miles per gallon for cargo. trucks 150 ton-miles per gallon for cargo. a passenger car is 2 tons and achieves 30 mpg so 60 ton-miles per gallon but that is DEAD WEIGHT of the car itself NOT useful cargo.
THIS is why lefties love trains. trains reduce the carbon footprint of cargo ( you ).
unfortunately because a subway train can take about 1,000 passengers to approach even a fraction of its capacity it has to operate in extremely dense areas that look like this:
from there the challenge Urbanist filth faces is to convince us that we want to live in such an area rather than in an area that looks like this:
towards that end they bend into a pretzel with the mental gymnastics to convince us that we would be happier to live with noise, stench, pollution, homeless, niggers and prostitutes and pedal through all that on a bicycle in rain and snow than enjoy an air conditioned self-driving personal vehicle on a way to a home with a backyard and view of the sky.
Good points. You're gonna have a blast arguing with Yuropoors especially the Dutch.
To their defense, I'll say that girls who drive cars are a lot fatter than the ones who cycle. As a rule of thumb.
oh i agree - when i was in San Diego California they had some kind of Rickshaw service there where college girls in short shorts pedal passengers around as a taxi service. they all had hot legs.
all women of reproductive age should be banned from operating motor vehicles and eating junk food.
it's for their own good ! ( and not in any way for my masturbatory pleasure )
This is so sexist, it must have crashed a couple of mastodon servers. You need to implement this in new Hampshire, new meaning of live free or die.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
