small charitable monopoly provides security -> get rich -> charitable monopoly security provider becomes big & tyrannical

perhaps a competitive for-profit security provider(s) would be preferable

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Are you describing ANCAP ???

*Last sentences

Competition & choice are the key. For profit or not for profit probably don't matter a whole lot. But I suspect a mutual aid or cooperative sort of arrangement might make more sense where security is concerned than in many other areas.