Nostr Web Client

Replying to anonymous

I think it does not work like that. IIUC antibiotics affect bacteria a lot more than viruses. From my limited understanding, that is a different scale. Bacteria are their own complete lifeform so that's a different "playing field", so to speak. (As opposed to viruses that penetrate the hosts's cells.)

The last news that I remember of it the developments in antibiotics, is that they found a number of new samples to work with and experiment on, so maybe the scientists are just satiated with work. (It's a guess.) I hope that's the case, because new antibiotics were evidently needed.

l0k1 2y ago

The whole reason why antibiotic resistance has become a problem is because doctors were prescribing them for viral infections, notably various kinds of colds.

Yet the irony is that the best treatments for these colds has actually been antiparasitics, quinines and related stuff. I personally think that these genetically modified viruses depend on endemic blood parasites, that are common but with very low lethality, and when you kill them off the virus has no platform to bounce off.

As for whether mRNA or antibiotics are important at all, if you ask me, both of them are attempts to sidestep the natural process and compensate for the inordinate amount of immune toxins and antibacterial substances and the sheer mass of sugars in people's diets.

What else would be feeding all the bad bacteria inside our bodies if it's not sugar?

I personally have had a long, ongoing problem with a whole range of health issues that affect my nerves and immune system, and merely 3 days without any form of sugar and I already feel way way better, and I'm keen to keep pushing the envelope on this.

Sugars are food for parasites and cancer and viruses. Seed oils diminish nerve insulation as does low fat diets. All of these problems started as part of a hoax against saturated fats to sell nickel catalyst modified seed oils. They fuck one thing up, then move to the next thing, and fuck it up as well, and these fuckups are piling up so hard that people are dropping dead "surprisingly".

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

anonymous 2y ago

From what I understand, a part of resistant bacteria is due to excessive use of antibiotics in livestock (or cattle, I am not sure about the right word), and also subsequently the traces in our diet.

I am not a fan of sugars either. I saw a presentation a while ago of some doctor Robert who explained in quite some detail how glucose is a sugar molecule the body handles gracefully, while fructose is a molecule that the body misinterprets and therefore remains longer than necessary and doesn't produce the feedback signal of satiation if you consume it. His talk seemed believable enough, although this one person is my primary source.

I don't know yet what to think about fats. My intuition tells me that it isn't as clear or definite as they pretend it is nowadays. There's this thing against salt. (I mean the plain salt, no alternatives) That's another thing that doesn't quite add up. And I have absolutely no clue about seed oils.

l0k1 2y ago

The antibiotics are definitely overused, and they sterilise the insides of the bodies of the animals and cause them also to become prone to harboring resistant and toxic bacteria, and that passes through into the milk and organ meats as well. Then there is also the fats since one of the major feeds used by these toxic big agra companies and pushed onto farmers is corn, which is also high in fructose, meaning inflammation in the animal, and oxidative free radicals, and the fats, also, and of course don't forget that Glyphosate is very soluble in these oils and very much carcinogenic.

Fructose feeds inflammation for sure. Look at the change in people's bodies in the last 20 years concurrent with the introduction of corn based HFCS. I think The Apocalypse of Yajnavalkya talks about fructose. It's definitely poison. When you degrade the antioxidants in fruits with dehydration and pasteurisation, eliminate the fibre, there's very little remaining that isn't toxic. We aren't adapted to eating it other than when the fruit is ripening in the midsummer.

And with all that excess, inflammation causing fructose and far too much glucose also, the body synthesises nasty sticky cholesterols that coat our blood vessels and eventually lead to heart attacks and strokes. I've seen pictures of what obese people's blood looks like after its been centrifuged and the amount of greasy gunk in it is incredible. The body makes it into fat because it's less toxic as fat!

The fats, I'm sure you have heard of the heart attack problems of Omega 6 fats, but they also lack important saturated fats, used to protect nerves, and stearic acid, very few vegetables have this, chocolate is one, and it's a true wonder food. Coconut has some in it too, also a wonder food.

anonymous 2y ago

Chocolate, really? Do you mean the raw cocoa or the candy bar? Because it seems there is a lot of sugar added when processing it into the bar.

l0k1 2y ago

I can't stand sugar with my chocolate, it's absolutely evil. Really upsets my gut. Pure chocolate, nothing added, nothing taken away, is very high in fat and especially stearic acid and forms a very brittle, hard waxy substance. Beef dripping is similar, and both can probably be used as candle wax.

And when you see the powdered chocolate, all the fat has been removed. Probably using a light petroleum distillate like naptha. Just wrong.

Pure whole chocolate makes my skin soft and to my eyes, seems to shed at least 5 years off my apparent age.

anonymous 2y ago

Add. it's doctor Robert Lustig. He did a few presentations and seems to be focused on this particular topic of the intricacies of the various sugar molecules in the body. (For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM )

l0k1 2y ago

Sounds interesting. Funny name though, I mean, literally.

Fructose is definitely poison. I don't think we really need glucose, but it at least doesn't do anything other than hurt the liver a bit and cause synthesised fats to be formed in the blood.

Fibre, on the other hand, yes, 100% fibre is needed. I recently added it to my diet and all of a sudden frequent problems with the toilet just vanished. One needs to be careful to not overdo it though, there is definitely a limit, somewhere around 2-3 teaspoons of Psyllium husk a day it can make things a little to solid. It goes really well with milk that's for sure.

Ah yeah, that's the one I forgot. The reason why fibre is so important is because it acts as a buffer for fats. The fats are insoluble in water, but dissolve rapidly in bile and in the process the fatty acids detach from the glycerol base and glycerol is laxative. So by taking fibre along with the fats, you slow down that hydrolysis of the triglycerides and this yields a more steady energy release for the body to either directly use for various tissues that need fats, or to convert it to glucose.

If you don't add fibre to your diet, you can't increase your fat intake, because it will give you the squirts at much more than about 10g in a meal, which is a piss amount of fat if you want to get energy from it. I found that around 100g of lard gave me energy all day long, combined with various kinds of fibrous plants, spinach, peas, roasted sunflower and pumpkin seeds, corn kernels, tomatoes, capsicum, carrots, broccoli, and so on.

I liked the way the 100+g fat per day diet made me feel, and I'm looking forward to getting it together again. Just been a bit busy setting up house recently, and trying to focus on building bitcoin/lightning/nostr things.