Nostr Web Client

These are good questions.

Some of these answers can be found in Ayn Rands work. And looking into rules without rules.

The infrastructure would be similar to Russia before 1917 revolutions or New York post capital and pre governance.

The self protection would be similar to WW2 Switzerland where everyone is armed or a mandatory military like many other countries.

The society structure still needs to be run by organisers.

The issues that arise are letting the worst of humanity run things

Remember to connect a wallet so I can zap this

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ω 🌍 Gus Posey 2y ago

nostr:npub1mu9wmykl7qx5llk69axd3rvk0hzhdd25jsqtj2hmnzjpn2sxum6s8jjj0t Thanks for your reply. In that example, how does the organizer (the leader?) differ from a ruler? Is it fair to say that the goal isn't the absence of rulers, per se, but their reduction to the absolute minimum?

NEW1 2y ago

I’ll give the example of business owners from regions without over bearing rulers. The business owner is the organiser. And rules a company of a well armed population. They employ the citizens and need to keep it balanced without force otherwise the business won’t thrive. This also goes into economic balance like the Nordic system of Socialised Capitalism.

The whole idea will need to be focused on a moral position. There won’t be a political answer to moral issues.