64
Sarah 2y ago

I’ve contemplated this carnivore thing and I can understand that some men would rather be cats, just because they are cared for more than men.

But! Eating only death has a morbid quality to it and would speak of the darker side of life as being comfortable with anything 8th house or scorpio related. Cats are comfortable with these energies as they are beings that can see between the veil. I am not sure humans are suited for that.. also eating something that is dead without having an issue with it seems like theres a part of compassion missing. It appears to me as if there is a stronger connection to ppl that fall under the category psychopaths or humans trained to kill and not care about it.

Its a long historic line as theres been too much war that has numbed that part of the collective psyche.

How long before the animals flesh gets poisonous after it died/got killed? Do you only eat the ones that are supposed to pass on or also the ones full of energy and life?

If you consume meat thats not poisonous yet you’re dwelling in an in between space where you’re consuming the part before death.. which is what keeps you alive. Another’s life force, not your own.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

64
Sarah 2y ago

Excuse me nostr:npub1dgpt04w4c88wc0g262xaw8zvlm4mvwtmjhl0tn2sxtyjywsn6q4qt8ka3a im quite busy today. I cant be you today. 😬

Avatar
antifragilemoney 2y ago

Just my 2cents:

Digestability changes (things akin to Rot/Spoilage) occurs in things like bananas, yams, milk, coconuts. If you have a bowl of fresh fruit, thats pretty good. But if you juiced that same bowl of fruit, threw it in the fridge, returned to it nextday and drank it. Its entirely different drink thatll only process as sugar.

Same as above applies to meats and there is a huge difference in taste and how body processes it based on similar factors above. Lots of "meats" consumed in usa tend to be processed, and pretty stale and reflects poorly on health.

However, a pathway many have found for their optimum health includes consuming lots of fresh redmeat, fish.

The societal, biological, and psychological ramifications are important to consider. An inconvenient setup and task for each family to locate, connect with, raise, and locate and butcher their own animals for meat, I'd agree would be an imrovement but unlikely in modern, "civilized" global cities.

Avatar
DefiantDandelion 2y ago

Everything that lives today, eats something that was living yesterday, but now isn’t. We are all the suns energy, if only in different forms of complexity.

64
Sarah 2y ago

True but plants dont have a digestive track or blood vessels.

I still think ingesting another mamal is very questionable. Maybe it soothes former cannibalism needs. At the time that this was a normal thing to do the emotional and mental abilities weren’t as developed yet and would probably be stored in the unconscious parts of the human behaviour. I do not think that every monkey brain instinct should be followed without review of ‘the why’ at this time and age.

Its a self disempowerment to follow urges.

Especially since it might not be the persons need who executes the satisfaction of the instinct… might just be lots of empaths picking up on the starving of the world…

Avatar
DefiantDandelion 2y ago

The human species is both a predator and prey. Secondly, it is one of the most social of animals. So, it is equipped with the instincts, tastes, nutritional requirements, pleasures, and pains to satisfy those roles. It’s complex and self contradictory because the evolution of the species which brought it to this point in its survival, doesn’t need to satisfy human rationality to be gene preserving. The contradiction of the human who will raise the young lamb or baby chick, feel the affection and cuteness, build a relationship over that time, take care of it well, and then harvest the animal for its meat to feed their own children or others, while shedding a tear at the loss in the moment, but in thankfulness consume it and make sure nothing goes to waste. It’s filled with uncomfortable cognitive dissonance. But a deviation from it results in a worse outcome. On one side Industrial food production causes mistreatment of animals, or on the other side Malnutrition of the human results from no meat/fat. And in either extreme, humans loosing their place and role as a species that is apart of the natural world, not distinct from it. You are correct, chasing urges can indeed go wrong, especially in an environment or position where there is no feedback from your actions. But the extreme alternative, which may result from a rational choice between the two human sides which by its nature is contradictory, is alienating yourself from what you are as a human. The complicating fact is that a human’s “wetware” does go wrong from time to time and they are monsters. So not all urges can be followed by all people. Enjoy your day!