I should hang this on my wall.

Yes, the first bike is vastly superior, but people want to go to work without sweating and not win the Tour de France.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't even want to pedal, maybe even a car that drives itself

Lol. True. :)

Correct, it's on my backlog, gonna take a look at this soon

What Nostr developers like x)

This is what itโ€™d look like if Vitor developed an Amethyst for iOS client

Lol

Looks like the crazy concept car Buckminster Fuller developed: https://www.bfi.org/about-fuller/big-ideas/dymaxion-car/

nostr: the last relay-bender

My take away: User's want utility (the storage box in the front). They don't just want a bike, they want accessories. ๐Ÿ˜‚

They want a comfortable bike that delivers for years without any issue, not an uncomfortable bike designed for speed only. A bike whose chain oil cannot stain their pants. A bike that has transporting options for the stuff they need to bring with them. And most importantly. A bike that doesn't make them look like assholes.

If this was true racing bikes would not exist.

The entire concept of this is flawed and is misrepresented.

Using this picture one could claim that everyone wants to be average.

Your bias, your agenda is not the reality, but just one side of the reality.

The American Mind Can't Comprehend this... "Why aren't they driving?!?"

Need car metaphor ๐Ÿคช

Sports car vs utility cars.

Sports car looks and drives better though

What? Have you driven one? They are absolutely terrible outside a race track, much less a daily commuter car. I would take an SUV anytime.

Yes, they are better especially for long travels on high roads, faster and more stable driving so you get less tired and you're less likely to get yourself killed for passing the grannies ahead. Modern sports cars has most of the comfort options SUVs has, the only real advantage of SUVs are for the big families.