Wall Street IS front-running the ETF approvals, just not the way some of you were expecting.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

guess I'm not missing out at all then

This is Wall Street logic.

Don't buy volatile Bitcoin.

Don't pick which ETF will be the winner.

Buy the custodian who will print money on fees whether Bitcoin goes up or down or sideways.

I'm not saying it's wrong, but it's not Bitcoin sooo

This is how they think:

You don't risk your capital on something as volatile as Bitcoin and you don't worry about which ETFs will get approved first or will see the most cash flow.

You buy the custodian of ALL the weeds ETFs who is going to print money on fees whether Bitcoin goes up, down, or sideways.

nostr:nevent1qqs9sxhjzk9f4gla48q8rdrefrvzhv4qjpfx4yelr67ytjrhrvsp2tqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqrgxfq9scm3mu0y6rfja0e4uyzgjyl24hax80m4kqda6wamvxq8vqvzqqqqqqyuazz70

I’ll tell you who’s front running this…BlackRock. I’m pretty sure I remember them stepping in and gobbling up Coinbase when it tanked into 30’s a while back.

I'm sure they did. Coinbase was grossly undervalued for a while. They have the longest and best track record of any exchange, so it made sense for them to be the custodian for these ETFs. Gotta have a solid spot market to have a spot ETF. Buying Coinbase is the safe play.

Blackrock will collect a small fee on this ETF for doing literally nothing. 0.59% I think is what I saw. They'll pay a small fee to Coinbase for the cash in/out conversions. Coinbase makes a mint by charging this to all the ETFs. So might as well own the custodian too.

Blackrock bought in early as soon as they decided they were going to use Coinbase as their custodian. The more recent +150% in COIN stock was the rest of Wall Street figuring out the same play.