We are talking about 2 completely different things here.

I am not dismissing Bitcoin as a store of value in my writings.

I said that I find it unlikely Bitcoin will be adopted as a mass medium of exchange.

You say:

> Stablecoins are completely irrelevant since they will just get devalued as their underlying currency, so the masses will quickly learn that stablecoins do not protect them from inflation at all.

So did the masses quickly learn how fiat doesn't protect them from inflation and stop using it, or do you think there might be other variables at play?

I don't think you read the posts at the bottom, so you're missing most of the context, but it is what it is.