I mean, the context is completely different. I get it. You don't like the guy and he doesn't pass your personal standards of what constitutes a leader.

If we're going back to the oriinal post, the I agree. He is different. The difference lies in what's promoted. He's not pushing "the narrative". The western "social justice warrior" type of stuff. He's pushing the national identity of his people. Not the bullshit they press on the world through Brussels and the WEF.

But statecraft is still statecraft. You can't pretend you have law and order when you don't. If you don't have law and order, then how do you bring people to justice? You can't. That order has to be established. You do that through strength.

The founding of every nation is done through war and brutality. A nation is forged.