Replying to ihsotas

You could always flood the network with illegal data. Core v30 didn’t enable anything new in this regard. People have been embedding wired shit on chain from the beginning. If Luke Dash jr is guilty of it.

Your scenario is absurd. Hosting a node would already be illegal because the chain already houses illegal data. It matters not if that data is in op return or embedded elsewhere.

I view this as a great test of your freedom. If a country tells me running a Bitcoin node is illegal then I know the country I’m in is not free.
Avatar
M-Vil 1mo ago

Why endanger what was conquered?

Why increase the risks?

Core devs are not stupid, they are compromised somehow.

We need a soft fork quickly

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

f7
ihsotas 1mo ago

So you want to change consensus because of a relay policy default change? Why don’t you just run the relay policy you prefer?

The soft fork is doa. The proponents of it won’t bet on their own horse when there is deep pockets asking to take the no fork side of the bet. Why would any miner mine a soft fork that has no value?

Avatar
M-Vil 1mo ago

Exactly!

Big money has compromised core devs!

The community overwhelmingly did not want the increase of Opreturn, they did it anyway and bragged nobody could stop them.

That's not what bitcoin is supposed to be about.

Fuk core devs.

It is not a coincidence that the ATH coincides with the release of v30

f7
ihsotas 1mo ago

Big op_returns already existed prior to core30 so to call this an emergency is a complete fabrication. It is this sort of dishonesty and unhinged freaking out that makes the majority laugh at you.

Removing big op returns will just mean more non prunable utxo bloat. It is impossible to stop key stuffing.

If you truly think the price has anything to do with this shit why haven’t you taken rob Hamilton up on his bet?