Medical students and trainees have no idea how much of what they are taught as 'medical fact' is the unsubstantiated conjecture of an industry gluttony for grant funding.
Discussion
What do you think are acceptable sources of information for medical trainees?
That's a good question, that I am sure people will argue about.
It brings up a salient point: how much you get out of a resource depends on how much you put in.
People will vary, based on some combination of motivation and skill.
I’m asking your personal opinion. What medical resources do you find to be credible?
I think constantly improving and updating your understanding of physiology is critical.
Wherever you are, whatever you have read - there is more.
And definitely ones you haven't encountered before.
Must process new ideas, they matter.
No the regulators won't keep up, but the doctor should.
Textbooks, lectures, journal articles.
Maybe even an unrelated field that had a similar conundrum?
I think most biology majors should read cells, gels and the engines of life.
When you can explain your critic’s viewpoint better than they can then you have “arrived”