"You will cause people to lose more sats by insisting they use their own keys and withdraw from exchanges than if you simply taught them to DCA on exchanges responsibly."

Sounds a lot like a udi take.

nostr:nevent1qqswu5cre8kuzcuhsmmayhss3vhlavz3pyvnqr8rkxd9tgcfdjvghsspvemhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33xeerqarv8psnxwtgdp3hyctsvycrxdf489uxz6rndfck5drnxpunvapjdc6kwurydvmrga3sxe48gem9ddckg6m6x4cxc0mzwfhkzerrv9ehg0t5wf6k2q3qlrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5sxpqqqqqqzj8hra0

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Does it, though?

DCA on exchange responsibly is impossible since Responsible Exchanges don't exist.

As opposed to custodial walletswho are guaranteed to be responsible?

They’re not, so never DCA on them. When it comes to DCA I’ve had to go KYC lite for now with a mix of coin control and running my own node to reduce exposure while keeping a record of everything. Everything else custodial is obfuscated with minimal amounts and full-on nym. Need to explore robosats et al next….

There is no guarantees, only self responsibility built by time spent learning.. More time, more responsibilities, for some guarantees.

Pure self sovereignty in #Bitcoin is a long and never ending path, everyone that approached it should know it.

Bitcoin is for responsible people.