Agree in general with you, but I cannot imagine a society where we would incarcerate a woman for aborting a pregnancy after being raped.
On the topic of abortion, you have a problem of conflicting rights: the right to choose to be a parent vs the right to life.
I find it hard to conceive of any situation in which the right to choose should supercede the right to life.
Abortion advocates often justify their position by dehumanizing the victim, thus negating the right to life. But dehumanizing the victim puts you on the same moral footing as Heinrich Himmler. I don't think it's a valid position.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/idaho-asks-us-supreme-court-allow-near-total-abortion-ban-2023-11-27/
Discussion
There's also incest. The reason why incest is forbidden in our society is that the children of incest often come out with severe congenital deformities. So most people agree that abortion is acceptable in those cases. But if you take that logic one step further you start euthanizing babies with fetal alcohol syndrome. When you start deciding who should live and who should die, where does it stop? Where do you draw the line?
Conception by incest is irrelevant to the fact that abortion murders an innocent child. If we applied capital punishment to rape and incest, perhaps there would be fewer murders of innocent babies.
Rape is irrelevant to the fact that you're killing an innocent baby.