Short answer: Claims made without evidence can be discounted with the same. The test was never released so I would ask you the same, what insider information do you have.

Long answer: The article has multiple points where it suggests that the test which was performed was not genetic but hormonal. Even with the results unreleased after disqualification suggests suspicious motive or results where is the transparency, other sources say as much. Which is why I wrote that she may have elevated testosterone. But Higher than typical testosterone isn’t evidence of chromosomes. Could be caused by a number of things. And it is at this point where it’s clear there isn’t really evidence of the controversy that’s been made with a number of possible explanations which are reasonable.