Wat.
Censorship resistance is only guaranteed if you can afford to incentivize a miner to mine your TX.. Bitcoin's ability to remain permissionless depends on having internet access and a device capable of running Tor or Tails.
Discussion
Its not accurate to only look at the network itself and ignore the context it exists in.
If Bitcoiners don't actually want to *disintermediate the legacy system* (ie fuck the banks),
then the legacy system will co-opt Bitcoin through regulatory capture.
As time goes on and there are more normie adjacent people in Bitcoin, the consensus of *what Bitcoin does* changes.
If that continues, it will become a nerfed speculative asset. Not necessarily because of a hostile fork situation (although possible) but simply because the "axiom of resistance" is false.
ie
nostr:note1v0l6vlgkjkxpkrdw6uqhy9p5r6835jr298qz8ke2j508vs2jheqs8lwdly
and yeah
you'll probably still be able to bribe a N Korean miner to get your transaction through in a few days.
That isn't censorship resistant.
If the user does not resist the censor, then no technology can provide him censorship resistance.
Security is always a human affair.