Its not accurate to only look at the network itself and ignore the context it exists in.

If Bitcoiners don't actually want to *disintermediate the legacy system* (ie fuck the banks),

then the legacy system will co-opt Bitcoin through regulatory capture.

As time goes on and there are more normie adjacent people in Bitcoin, the consensus of *what Bitcoin does* changes.

If that continues, it will become a nerfed speculative asset. Not necessarily because of a hostile fork situation (although possible) but simply because the "axiom of resistance" is false.

ie

nostr:note1v0l6vlgkjkxpkrdw6uqhy9p5r6835jr298qz8ke2j508vs2jheqs8lwdly

and yeah

you'll probably still be able to bribe a N Korean miner to get your transaction through in a few days.

That isn't censorship resistant.