Yes it’s the same “guideline violation” aka selling digital content with bitcoin, which we’re not.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can we invert the connection so that Damus doesn't know about the wallet? Then you're just adding reactions with amounts

Hah! Yes, I forgot about Zapple Pay! Can we make this idea easier to use?

I don't think it could possibly be any easier to use but maybe easier to discover... as with most of the cool microapps.

Well, you need to trust the zapplepay server, but this could be folded into AlbyHub, and zaps have an amount and a message that reactions don't. With these two things, Damus "without zaps" would function the same as Damus with them

That doesn't sound easier at all 😅 but I get what your saying.

Hmm, I actually don't know which wallet most people link for Damus zaps

They would consider that selling the reaction you’re using to react with

If Damus doesn't know about the wallet, what can Apple even point to? Tony's zapplepay.com does this

If the goal is to make it incomprehensibly hard and unintuitive to use zaps then sure

If Damus made "reactions with amounts and messages", and setting up the backend was easier, would either of those things be true?