Discussion
It's a shame to see that the vast majority of Bitcoiners lack critical thinking skills and are heading for the cliff according to their masters' plan.
Bitcoiners are not much different from ordinary people; most of them vote, got vaccinated against COVID, believe in democracy, and trust people like Peter Thiel.
Shit.
Solo queda la esperanza de que el que corre un nodo este metido en tema y decida con criterio .
I'm curious to know why is it that Alpen Labs ( https://www.alpenlabs.io/) did not seem to need the OP_RETURN change?
From https://docs.alpenlabs.io/how-alpen-works/bitcoin-bridge
"Apart from the previous Taproot output, the DRT has some metadata attached to it, in the form of an OP_RETURN output, that must be the second output of the transaction in order for the Alpen sequencer to be able to detect the transaction. The OP_RETURN output can be up to 80 bytes long (according to bitcoin standardness policy), and is composed of the following data:
- Magic bytes. These take 4 bytes and are used to identify the bridge.
- Depositor public key (X-only). This takes 32 bytes and are used to validate the DRT, while also necessary for the control block required to spend the P2TR output via the N-of-N Tapscript.
- Execution Layer address. The EL address is the Alpen address where the user wants to receive the BTC on Alpen. It is a 20-byte Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) address."
So why could not Citrea do this? #asknostr #op_return
Imteresting
👀