Replying to Avatar rabble

What’s the real 1st ammendment implications of the proposed TikTok ban / divestment law?

nostr:npub1uuxnz0sq60thc098xfxqst7wnw77l0sm3r8nn48yspuvz4ecprksxdahzv takes an indepth look at the case and it’s implications for free speech on the internet in the US.

nostr:note1s5msfydfl0nz3m44qxgg52jtarnsdjnfzluajflkwh7znkt8w5cq9zm0de

TikTok is the agent of a foreign government. As such I doubt the 1st Amendment applies to them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But as the law professors point out in the article, the company that runs TikTok is incorporated in the US, and thus is subject to US law.

That they are a subsidiary of a Chinese corporation (which is not owned by the Chinese government) doesn't change the legal status of the US entity.

https://theconversation.com/tiktok-law-threatening-a-ban-if-the-app-isnt-sold-raises-first-amendment-concerns-229879

Still an agent of the CCP.