We added it to view nsec, so why not DMs? Makes sense to me.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Optional Layers of privacy are always beneficial IMO.

What happens if user does not utilize face ID? Passcode prompt?

Yeah just local auth

πŸ‘

Make sure it’s optional to opt in Ser πŸ™

It doesn't force faceid, just local auth which can be pin or face. That's all i meant

The difference with cagedbird DMs is that client provider is not able to see content of your DMs. From this perspective a layer of security makes sense.

It does add a bit of friction. I wonder if there will be pushback to make this optional.

It is optional

Local auth makes a ton of sense thank you sm πŸ™Œ