I saw that this wasn’t “supposed” to be leaked until the 30th, is there a reason why that is acceptable? Haven’t had a chance to listen to RHR yet
Discussion
there's nothing about this that wasn't "supposed" to be public at this point in time.
So am I understanding you correctly that this was discovered as a new exploit, and there should have been some kind of report published on the 30th? Otherwise I’m not sure I follow and I’ll just reserve myself until I listen to RHR
the significance of the 30th is that the developer that discovered the vulnerability and responsibly disclosed it in december 2022, antoine riard, was doubted in the mailing list a few days ago when the disclosure was finally made public. in response to the doubts, riard says he will publish more on oct 30
I see, and thank you for putting up with my questions 😂
all good. dispelling fud is something that bitcoiners are used to, right? btw here's the quote from the screenshot in the original tweet. not sure why op decided to word things so strangely other than creating fud:
"
I'll be silent on those issues on public mailing lists until the week of
the 30 oct. Enough material has been published and other experts areavailable. Then I'll be back focusing more on bitcoin core.
"
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-October/004154.html