They can zap wash all they want, it is not relevant to what I’m talking about here. I’m referring to using zaps *to you* to filter content from the outside world. Zap washing and fake zaps are only relevant when you want to start using zaps for algos, which I think would be really flawed unless it incorporated a trust graph of some kind.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yep totally agree with you here then. I for one am ready to replace email entirely with Zapped messages.

I think it's also useful to have trusted verification services that receive zaps, could even be your own auth service that account pay in to once in order to show up on your feed or w/e. Just spitballing here, but in general agree.

I agree but also we should be wary of creating a “trust graph” because it would probably end up with “trusted” zap servers which would disincentive people from running their own servers