How about this one
Discussion
Why don't I just use lightning and get it over with? It's much easier, safer and more private this way.
In addition, the counter-party I'm transacting with happily accepts it unlike your shitcoin.
10 years have passed and still nobody around me deals with your shitcoin.
When will the people here start using it? In another 10 years.
Sorry, you're still a shitcoin peddling shitcoiner.
I gave you an answer for every question you asked.
And as always something with you dumb fucking idiots.
I proved you donβt know shit about anything & that you in fact are a scammer.
So I need to convince the local goods supplier to start accepting your shitcoin in order for us to transact?
Is this your solution? Really?
Did you find this answer on Google as well? π€£
You shouldn't get mad when people are honest with you. If you want to scam people with your shitcoin, you must accept the consequences.
Do you understand shitcoiner?
If you don't think anyone accepts Monero, it doesn't make sense to suggest something even less accepted than: Lightning. A fraction of Monero's acceptability and usage.
Lightning is not as private as Monero. Why do yall keep pretending it is? Receiver privacy is trash and private channels can be derived.
"We identified 27,183 private channels, discovered hidden balances, and showed how a passive adversary can infer payment endpoints with very high probability."
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.12470.pdf
Look at all these inconveniences that come with LN that you conveniently leave out:
Reliance on middlemen nodes for succesful routing and cheapest fees,
illusion of final settlement,
need capacity to recieve,
can't send modestly large amounts,
both parties must be online to transact,
can be rugged if your node isn't active,
can be force closed onto the base chain against your will.
..and it still overpromises on scaling!!! π€¦ββοΈ
Never seen that site before thx