Why is 5g so controversial yet 1g, 2g,3g & 4g were just fine.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don’t see 5G as uniquely controversial… it’s more like an inflection point.

Earlier generations already introduced chronic EMF exposure. What’s changing now is density, proximity, and saturation.

More antennas, higher frequencies, more devices, less recovery time for biological systems.

So it’s not “5G vs 4G”… it’s cumulative load on organic life, and we’re clearly past the threshold where it’s negligible.

I haven’t done enough research to be sure either way. I just see people freaking out about 5g specifically and it reminds me of this

They were not, there were lawsuits in Italy literally 15 years ago.

The difference is that 5G antenna arrays

Are way more energetic, to the point where standing in front of one with beamforming off is like standong in front

Of a 25kW microwave.

Which you will not survive for very long.

TLDR: lots of data needs lots of power going through your body.