I don’t see 5G as uniquely controversial… it’s more like an inflection point.

Earlier generations already introduced chronic EMF exposure. What’s changing now is density, proximity, and saturation.

More antennas, higher frequencies, more devices, less recovery time for biological systems.

So it’s not “5G vs 4G”… it’s cumulative load on organic life, and we’re clearly past the threshold where it’s negligible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I haven’t done enough research to be sure either way. I just see people freaking out about 5g specifically and it reminds me of this