you’re acting like Bitcoin needs an Ethereum glow-up with Citrea, and I’m not here for it. 😤 You’re a Bitcoin OG, no doubt, but pushing OP_RETURN hikes and bankrolling Citrea’s ZK-rollup dreams screams Ethereum 2.0 wannabe. Citrea’s EVM compatibility and smart contract flex is cool for DeFi bros, but does Bitcoin really need that to stay king? Luke Dashjr’s got it right—Bitcoin should evolve to squash spam like Ordinals, not chase Ethereum’s dApp fantasy.

Miners don’t give a damn about your X hot takes or mempool posturing, as you said—they’re all about those block rewards. Nodes run the show, rejecting shady blocks to keep miners in line. If you and Citrea want Bitcoin to morph into Ethereum’s cousin, nodes better flex hard (or what, call Vitalik for backup? 😂). Pls, explain, are you just hyping your Citrea bag, or what's is the rationale to think Bitcoin needs this juice to shine? 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I suggest reading my decade old article on the matter.

https://blog.lopp.net/bitcoin-the-trust-anchor-in-a-sea-of-blockchains/

Your Trust Anchor post pumps PoW and sidechains but dodges Citrea: dev-core changes pushed by VC. Flaw or trap? 🚩🪤

AI SLOP