nostr:npub15m9yc697s82zzy652py0uddmpp5e9xl0920vg6lau9n39fnnzsys6mq643 That’s a great observation. I can only offer my perspective, so for what it’s worth: while coopting, centralizing, and corrupting by those who have outsized influence are forces worth fighting, the government’s explicit power to coerce is a much bigger threat. In my sense - and in only my sense - many progressives seem to want to use government power to satisfy their passions for justice, and believe that having a simple majority of a voting populace on their side somehow absolves them of the moral evil of coercion. However, I see coercion as the fundamentally dehumanizing social force.

Private charity is alive and well; I want to affirm my progressive friends’ senses of justice and work with them where I can to bring about better outcomes for people, but without resorting to control.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hey Steve, it doesn’t show me what observation/post you’re referring to. I’m. Assuming the conservatives/progressives can agree on 80% of things post?

Yeah, I screwed up and somehow didn’t reply to the thread but created a new note. Anyway it was your repost of Trey Walsh’s note. FWIW, I think Trey makes an important point about being consistent. My counter went to threat asymmetry: while Wall Street has NGU and ETF concentration as attack vectors, Warren and Trudeau have bank accounts and prisons.

We’re all on team orange. 👊🏻