Bitcoin winning absolutely entails nation state adoption. Believing otherwise is pure delusion.
Discussion
And that is a good thing. You are right that nation states will change as a result of Bitcoin becoming the dominant form of money. We aren’t quite there yet, but it is coming. 
Nation state continuance under the status quo is the kind of fallacy someone who self styles under “Alan Watts” really ought not be using as justification for their worldview.
Like that is way out of line with what you’re supposed to be portraying. I’m no Watts expert, but I do know that.
So if you’d like to make the claim that nation state adoption is core to Bitcoin’s enduring success “ALAN WATTS”, you should engage the argument I proposed that nation states ought not continue under the Status Quo and Bitcoiners ought be replacing them and be in charge of those systems which for some bizarre reason you just don’t want to touch.
Your replies are full of anger, intellectual dishonesty, and ad hominem attacks. May you find the peace you are looking for.
Your replies are full of shit, have zero intellectual depth, don’t even match your ideological portrayal of “Alan Watts” and are supposed to pass judgement on something as serious as the state adopting Bitcoin despite having zero rigour behind it.
You’ve been found out here.
You're right that he is failing to engage with your argument. But you are also overreacting and engaging in attacks on his presentation that are probably not relevant and definitely not helpful toward getting him to engage in the real argument you made originally.
That’s fine, I’m just pointing out the irony of how close-minded “Alan Watts” is.
Like if that’s who you’re going to style yourself after
1) don’t be a complete statist cuck -and-
2) actually have an open mind
Agreed but I don't think he's being a statist, just failing to really listen and have an open mind on this one point, to our points of view.