ok illustrative example:

no matter where you are on the political spectrum, and especially if you are a man, you should be catching some of heather cox richardson

why:

via wikipedia: Heather Cox Richardson is an American historian who works as a professor of history at Boston College, where she teaches courses on the American Civil War, the Reconstruction Era, the American West, and the Plains Indians. She previously taught history at MIT and the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Richardson has authored seven books on history and politics. In 2019, she started publishing Letters from an American, a nightly newsletter that chronicles current events in the larger context of American history. Richardson focuses on the health of American democracy. As of July 2025, the newsletter had over 2.6 million subscribers, making it one of the most popular Substack publications.

nostr:nevent1qqsw5mte0grfx9288py8dqavyzvgxrkd3hnx60vuv9ru82xedl0fs7cpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsmjfw3z

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

she is really good at what she does

she is in a pretty timeless clockless flow state giving ~a lot~

it is pretty extraordinary to witness

it is also wild to assess strategically as in, what she goes after, how she fights, what she wont speak about (gaza)

re: strategy it appears re: her understanding of fascism, that the president is a strongman, and so, weaken him by being ableist

as in, where she gets fascist, like lets fight fascist with fascist, is on ageism and disability

it is wild to me how much she goes after him on mental incompetence grounds

and you miss all that, you give all that up, if you identify as too ancap to handle a woman historian

look at how embarrassing this is:

like hcr is the premiere lezzo stud out here just stealing wives

do you know what a bad husband you gotta be to lose your wife this way?

heather isnt radical. she is ~extremely~ consensus reality on most if not all issues, very well researched, always out there inventing new questions to ask and strategizing where to find sources to even get answers in expertly mundane and sensible ways that only seem obvious in retrospect

she makes it look so damn easy

the article could be titled: when two supremacists clash

"Their truce had limitations, because “anything intellectual turned philosophical turned political,” as Tom put it.

And because Kate couldn’t help herself."

And because Kate couldn’t help herself

And because Kate couldn’t help herself

And because Kate couldn’t help herself

Kate was too voracious

Kate was too hungry

Kate was an insatiable woman with an appetite

Kate had no discipline

Kate had no sense of time and occasion

Kate had no sense of priority

(i have a video i will link later, and its gonna be great)

reread objectively:

In Kate, a “hardcore liberal feminist” with a Ph.D. in history, he found a “fellow traveler” of the world’s philosophical terrain, he said. She had an easy, inherent joy, but she could also throw her weight around in conversations about geopolitics: “A rare kind of somebody.”

Kate:

- “hardcore liberal feminist”

- with a Ph.D. in history,

- easy, inherent joy,

- could also throw her weight around in conversations about geopolitics

- “A rare kind of somebody.”

i mean, i bet she can help herself, i bet she does have discipline, i bet she is aware of time, place, occasion, priority, it actually isnt effortless to have easy inherent joy that's a choice

in all likelihood wasn't taken, wasn't stolen, dont need to infantilize Kate, chose to detonate her marriage

so if she chose this, with agency

w h y

well first of all, maybe it is embarrassing that her husband calls other people muggles

but then again, wanting to vote for Genocide Harris, maybe she loves viewing people as muggles, too

anyway, it doesnt sound like he was into his wife, and she doesnt sound into him

and they both sound mean

and so, idk

probably better off