Oh…I misunderstood. You see that on blossom.band?
Discussion
Yes, the link is from blossom band: nostr:npub1dryseu6yv7evgz2f7pfzk6wht8flapcfv5l6r4y65pg5px293awqlwwfpc.blossom. band/ad15b6cad2dda9c74727138df1d95545ed2dcad2f9eb183d5d9a78757aebd9d8.jpg
Ok I’ll just have to see what they say
You could also try and see if Amethyst, Primal or any other client does and if it works. I am not sure if nip94 tags are causing the issue
nostr:npub1n0sturny6w9zn2wwexju3m6asu7zh7jnv2jt2kx6tlmfhs7thq0qnflahe I think I found the issue. It seems that Nostur expects full nip96 like response in blossom nip94 tags, while BUD08 just states tags array of arrays under nip94 field, nothing else. Initially I got it wrong too, and returned it as your check does. Now it is fixed and complies with BUD08 specs.
https://github.com/hzrd149/blossom/blob/master/buds/08.md - for reference
I see, fixing this now thanks!
I made identical mistake in the beginning, and nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 spotted it before I realized the fault 😂🤣
When I was implementing it I was expecting it to be like nip96 too lol
🙏