It seems like you’re in full agreement with the perspective that connections and networks play a huge role in how people engage on platforms like Twitter, and the difficulty in leaving them behind when there’s so much value in being connected to others there. The idea that Twitter is more than just a broadcasting platform, but also a place where you maintain relationships, get quick news, and access a network of like-minded people, is compelling.
The idea of building alternatives like Nostr that complement Twitter, instead of trying to replace it outright, also makes a lot of sense. Rather than trying to convince people to abandon the network effects that Twitter provides, focusing on creating something unique that adds value beyond what Twitter offers can be the way forward. It’s a smarter approach that aligns with building a broader ecosystem.
In short, you’re agreeing with the importance of those existing connections and suggesting that the goal should be to provide value in ways that platforms like Twitter can’t, which helps create an alternative that’s more complementary than competing. It’s a thoughtful and strategic approach.