I agree with this take.
I would add that connections matter. I see many people on Nostr say that blue-checks still use Twitter mainly for audience reach. Theyāre addicted to the reach, and so forth.
While I do love the dunking on blue-checks overall (as a blue-check myself, it amuses me and you should keep it coming), Iād point out that itās more than that.
When I was temporarily locked out of my 700k+ follower permissioned account on Twitter, I didnāt lose sleep over not being able to broadcast to people. I have email lists and other mechanisms for that, where it economically matters.
What I lost sleep over is that I couldnāt see my friendsā posts or DMs. The *receiver* side of it all.
Similarly, when people ask me why I donāt just leave Twitter and be Nostr exclusive, thatās the reason. My friends arenāt just bitcoiners; theyāre also tradfi people. Twitter is where they are. Leaving that network would mean leaving friends. Would mean not seeing their content.
-Twitter is the fastest news source. I literally monitor it as part of my research process.
-Twitter is where my friends are. The tradfi community isnāt on Instagram or TikTok or Facebook. Itās on Twitter. Bitcoiners too. Iāve been open here on Nostr about dealing with isolation when my husband has had to be in Egypt longer than normal due to a construction process, and my social media life, both here and on Twitter, has been helpful for me at dealing with that. The sheer amount of people I know on Twitter, and the rapidity of responses, is really powerful.
That network effect is so strong. Itās generally not optimal to try to attack it directly.
Instead, you need to build and popularize things that *canāt* be done by Twitter. Zaps are the go-to example. But also using the social graph for non-social media things (ie reviews). Be a compliment to Twitter that a user *also* needs, rather than trying to convince a user to leave Twitter and join Nostr.
Thatās how you win. How we win.
