Funding the building of a building is not building a building but builders can't build a building without the funding.
Discussion
Sounds very Keynesian.
Also, many things have been built without funding. Explore the world of FOSS for examples.
Who funded Satoshi?
If the independently wealthy become the only builders, we're all fucked
Define "imdependently wealthy". 🤔
Define builders
Those who build.
You declared the noun "builder" first though so please clarify my understanding if it is incorrect.
Yeah that's right. So if me as a builder can't build because no one is paying me to build, and I must instead go forage for food in the woods, I'm kind of fucked. Now scale that up and you can see that there are no builders without people to trade with. Financiers are a vital part of a society, regardless of the distaste we plebs have for them in this moment in time.
Define builders
You appear to be of the opinion that paying someone to do something makes you a keynsian. If I don't get paid, I don't build. At the end of the day, I have to put food on the table
https://mises.org/wire/why-must-supply-precede-demand-understanding-economic-foundations
Saying buikders need funding first is a fallacy. Funding is someone seeking a good or service, a demand. Builder do not need funding to build.
I do nof get paid for many things i build. Things worth building will be built, regardless of funding. Fiat prices has distorted market perception.