The biggest messaging difference here is one is speaking from an ethnocentric viewpoint and one is a worldcentric viewpoint. Both are valid. One includes more women. Signed, a woman.
Discussion
Sorry. Just trying to understand. Which view is more ethnocentric, what makes it centered around ethnicity, and what makes one view include more women than the other?
Ethnocentric would be more community, tribe, or group centric (not necessarily only ethnicity). Not a bad thing. Necessary for human continuation. The worldcentric view includes more women because some women aren't able to have children or don't want children because their own childhoods were so traumatic or they were raped 15 times as a teenager and hate men or etc. You're speaking from your own experience, which while valid, is limited because you're a man with a family you've created. Beautiful, but only about 50% of all humans experience. So please take that into consideration. Your wife's experience is not all women's experience. Not all men are as good and standup as you. Thanks for being a good one.
Thank you. And I partially agree but it used to be far more than 50% and I think it still is now but has declined with the feminist movement and since then overall happiness has seen the same decline. I believe they are correlated.
There are always exceptions as you point out but there is also just human nature. We're biologically engrained to make babies. That doesn't mean that's the best and only path to happiness.
Absolutely. Debase the currency, debase the foundation of society, debase the nuclear family. This is why we both bitcoin, I imagine.
Also since men are only 50% thats why I said that experience can only be 50% Max.
Oh yes, I was thinking in terms of 50% of women but I see what you are saying
Well, if you're going to the human nature point, then men are biologically engrained to spread their seeds far and wide, which counters to your belief in a satellite family.
Cant overlook this lol hereforth im gonna give all the dicks a pass bc its a genetic imperative to be one Jk
Well, not just men. It's a human thing, but it's an unpopular opinion and not the point I'm trying to make here.
Not in human being or other mammals. It's more beneficial for humans to be in monogamous relationships. This is true for a lot of the animal kingdom. We must care for young, they can't take care of them selves and societally we produce more productive humans in 2 parent homes.
💖💖💖
Also, thank you for applauding my commitment to my family but I do want to add we should be fostering a culture that holds all men accountable for children they create and the women they create them with. The level of single parent homes is astonishing and the primary reason for societal collapse to the point we're currently at.
Absolutely. When engaging strangers on the internet, I always look for the good bc otherwise im likely to dismiss their humanity and make them feel not worthy of breathing which in turn creates friction in our interactions.