I'm all for a heavily limited state, but property rights can't exist in a state of anarchy.
Military and police for property protection are legitimate in my opinion.
I'm not convinced that there will be less murder, rape, theft, etc with no government at all.
The only rights you ever have are those you can assert. The same remains true whether there is a gang of thieves ruling over everyone or not.
Why does consensus over who owns a UTXO need to stop with money? I've wondered if something similar to Bitcoin could be done with real estate.
I pretty much agree with you though.
