Replying to wertyyryyr

https://invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=TEXaOc3fzWc this one very interesting, especially when CIAlor talks about tech and political decentralization, according to him none can live outside google and apple ecosystem.

Avatar
Shashue 🌳🛖⛰️ 1y ago

Well, one of my take aways was this...in 1 or maybe 2 generations, there will be a newer younger Mike on stage or on a podcast such as this one.

And just as Mike has made several references to the successes of Meta, Google & Apple, the new Mike will be making similar references to the successes of today's visionairies. Such as Microstrategy, Mara and perhaps a few others whom have not yet played their hands publically.

So the question I wonder about is, will their success be a net benefit for mankind or not?!

What does your crystal ball say to that question?!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

84
wertyyryyr 1y ago

As a Linux user, self hosting many things I have no hope that the masses will do the same, but maybe a sort of federated, decentralized a la mediaeval is possible and likely, nostr seems the way. Plus big tech only works with fiat money.

Avatar
Shashue 🌳🛖⛰️ 1y ago

I'd cosign those sentiments as well. But I think what he was suggesting is that there are multiple paths to winning with #BTC.

The path of the Pleb, we work for it, buy it and never sell it.

The path of the public corporation, they hold it in their treasury and leverage fiat (debt) to get more #BTC

And the late ones, they are for the most past only able to participate on the lightning or other comparable layerered network. We're probably a few generations away from this point.

Most governments are going to do what they can to slow down the rate of adoption, while others will (likely smaller and more desperate states) will embrace it earlier. But that matters not, bc #BTC adoption is inevitable.

The concept of economic warfare between nation states is not a new one, so I won't expand on that. It's been going on for a long time.