Replying to Avatar bumi

True. hmm, that spec needs to be updated there. because if more than one is provided then it should be an array imo relay[]=xxx&relay[]=yyy

otherwise different parsers interpret it differently.

At the same time multiple relays add some complexity for apps and wallets. so far all NWCs used one relay afaik.

I personally doubt that relays for NWC are the weak link in the chain and need redundancy that the event is published to multiple ones.

Also considering privacy and that those are no "normal" events.

Do you know why nostr.mom seems to not work for NWC events?
Avatar
Minibits 1y ago

Agree, relay[] is supported encoding in query strings, but I'm afraid it might not be what nwc clients expect.

Will consider to point it to my strfry instance relay.minibits.cash

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
bumi 1y ago

I am rather sure that no nwc client supports multiple relays at this point.

and the implementation like in the spec would have issues because of underlaying query parsers.

Avatar
Minibits 1y ago

Ok will change it in the next release.