True. hmm, that spec needs to be updated there. because if more than one is provided then it should be an array imo relay[]=xxx&relay[]=yyy

otherwise different parsers interpret it differently.

At the same time multiple relays add some complexity for apps and wallets. so far all NWCs used one relay afaik.

I personally doubt that relays for NWC are the weak link in the chain and need redundancy that the event is published to multiple ones.

Also considering privacy and that those are no "normal" events.

Do you know why nostr.mom seems to not work for NWC events?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Agree, relay[] is supported encoding in query strings, but I'm afraid it might not be what nwc clients expect.

Will consider to point it to my strfry instance relay.minibits.cash

I am rather sure that no nwc client supports multiple relays at this point.

and the implementation like in the spec would have issues because of underlaying query parsers.

Ok will change it in the next release.