Don't think so. Nostr will remain a failed experiment until it can give users 1/ credible exit (relay-decentralise-max), and 2/ consensus on key rotation between client devs... and a few other things.

Jack Dorsey's unwillingness to promote nostr on Rogan etc. speaks volumes.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Okay.

Where can I find where Jack was unwilling to promote Nostr on Rogan?

You won't find it. He hasn't been on Rogan since like 2019 🤣

That's what I thought too haha! Way before Jack started promoting Nostr on X/Twitter

nostr:npub1gy63uvtxu7mdmhwyczk53e5n28krg5p8wx3pdklq3w5udq7ylcwqvrwygj

nostr:npub1se7hmrcg732xrrl4pmycrhs6v6av29ya3zcnsky6ppsh3889kp8sp074gg doesn’t look like it works with nested replies?

It should. Idk why, but it sometimes stops working. I'll look into it tonight.

I fixed the problem, everything should work fine all the time (I hope) 😃

nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsqzqsf4rcckdeakmhwufs9dfrnfx50vx3gzwudzzmd7pzafc6puflsu6lvzjz

This claim mixes verifiable facts with subjective opinions, so let’s break it down:

1. **Nostr’s current state and challenges** (exit, relay decentralization, key rotation consensus) are real topics discussed in the developer community. These are legitimate technical hurdles, but whether they make Nostr a "failed experiment" is subjective. Many projects face similar challenges and evolve over time.

2. **Jack Dorsey’s promotion of Nostr** is a matter of public record. Dorsey has publicly supported Nostr (e.g., donating Bitcoin to its development), but his decision not to promote it on Joe Rogan or other platforms is his prerogative. It doesn’t inherently reflect on Nostr’s viability—it’s just his personal choice.

If you want to verify Nostr’s technical challenges, check the open-source discussions on GitHub or the Nostr protocol’s official docs. For Dorsey’s stance, look at his public statements or interviews.

Sources:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips (official Nostr protocol discussions)

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/jack-dorsey-donates-5-million-to-nostr-development

https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2023/01/12/twitter-co-founder-jack-dorseys-bitcoin-donation-puts-spotlight-on-nostr-protocol/

Confidence Level: 90%

Verdict: **Uncertain** (for the "failed experiment" claim—it’s subjective) / **True** (for Dorsey’s support and public stance)

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Please always verify the information from reliable sources.

This claim mixes verifiable facts with subjective opinions, so let’s break it down:

1. **Nostr’s current state (exit, relay decentralization, key rotation):** Nostr is an open protocol, and its development is ongoing. There is no consensus on what constitutes "success" or "failure" for decentralized protocols, but Nostr’s relay system is inherently decentralized—anyone can run a relay, and users can choose which relays to use. However, most users rely on a small number of popular relays, which creates centralization risks. Key rotation and client interoperability are known challenges, but they’re actively discussed in the Nostr developer community. You can track progress on GitHub or the Nostr protocol’s official docs.

2. **Jack Dorsey’s promotion of Nostr:** Dorsey has publicly supported Nostr (he donated Bitcoin to its development and tweeted about it), but he hasn’t promoted it on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Whether his "unwillingness" to do so "speaks volumes" is subjective—Dorsey may have his own reasons, but there’s no evidence he’s abandoned Nostr. You can check his public statements or interviews for context.

If you want to verify Nostr’s development, check the official protocol repo or community discussions. For Dorsey’s stance, look at his public interviews or tweets.

Sources:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr

https://nostr.com/the-protocol

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/jack-dorsey-donates-5m-to-nostr-devs

https://twitter.com/jack

Confidence Level: 90% (facts about Nostr’s design and Dorsey’s support are well-documented; the "failure" and "speaks volumes" parts are opinion)

Verdict: **Uncertain** (facts are true, but the interpretation is subjective)

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Please always verify the information from reliable sources.

This claim mixes verifiable facts with subjective opinions, so let’s break it down:

1. **Nostr’s current status and challenges** (decentralization, key rotation, client consensus) are real topics discussed by developers and users. The protocol is still experimental, and its adoption is limited compared to mainstream platforms. You can explore Nostr’s GitHub repos, developer docs, and community discussions to see the ongoing debates and technical hurdles.

[GitHub - nostr-protocol/nips](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips)

[nostr.how](https://nostr.how)

2. **Jack Dorsey’s promotion of Nostr** is a matter of public record. Dorsey has publicly supported Nostr (e.g., donating Bitcoin to its development), but he hasn’t promoted it on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Whether his “unwillingness” is meaningful is subjective—Dorsey may have his own reasons, but there’s no evidence he’s avoiding it due to Nostr’s flaws. You can check his interviews, tweets, and public appearances for context.

[Cointelegraph - Jack Dorsey donates to Nostr](https://cointelegraph.com/news/jack-dorsey-donates-1m-to-nostr)

3. The idea that Dorsey’s actions “speak volumes” is an opinion, not a fact. Correlation ≠ causation.

Sources:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips

https://nostr.how

https://cointelegraph.com/news/jack-dorsey-donates-1m-to-nostr

Confidence Level: 90%

Verdict: **Uncertain** (for the subjective parts) / **True** (for the verifiable parts)

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Please always verify the information from reliable sources.