(Small) Nation States that go zero bitcoin tax, no prohibition, zero censorship, bitcoin only policy......

will attract bitcoin capital in this environment.

Others have to follow.... Maybe naive.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The problem is that those states would become economic ghettos. Almost all financial transactions will happen elsewhere and it would be easy to simply sanction anyone in that ghetto.

Another option would be washing/mixing/reanonymizing utxos.

Plus striktly separating the registered & unregistered part of your wallet.

& Consciously picking coins/addresses for official transactions versus

"dark/parallel" economy.

People will just switch to Monero for the dark stuff. Anything else is too annoying and limiting.

Monero has the inflation/validation problem.

For anonymous uncensorable transacting it's cool. Store of long term value is the problem.

On the problem above : It's happening already (Jurisdictional arbitrage) Many German Bitcoiners travel to CzechR./Prague to insert Cash anonomously into BTC-ATMs. That's it.

If they need Euros back they go on Regional BTC-Meetups and Cash out again. All those models have "friction" of course (traveling, price premium compared to registered X-changes...)

But if the friction in the legacy system is way higher, it's worth it. And nothing beats beeing outside the collapsing system.

The costs for the legacy system (enforcement costs) are rising as well.

You see them charging every minor infringement (speeding, parking...) but aren't able to establish basic security (borders, neighborhoods, public transport).

Yes, this is the thing. Anarcho-tyranny, where they pester the peaceful and good-willed, while the violent criminals run wild and the infrastructure crumbles.

💯

In cheap hardware wallets like Trezor-One (~50EUR) there is always optional UTXO selection when spending.

Whilst receiving just use different addresses.

Not that hard technically.

Yes.

Good point.