No double spend, at least not technically what we understand as a double spend.

I think what I did was successfully trick their internal database. They infrastructure logic is buggy and it allowed me to transact via Linghtning although I had committed funds onchain.

This happened in between Muun’s attempts to rebroadcast my failed onchain transaction.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But then they just gave you a loan in bitcoin πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ˜‚

I got the fees reimbursed, so to speak πŸ˜…πŸ˜‚

I was able to exploit their Lightning liquidity pool when their internal logic thought I had received my fubds back after the failure of onchain transaction, even though their own logic was going to try to rebroadcast the transaction.

Muun is screwed, so screwed…

Damn πŸ« πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

I decided to send them an email explaining the exploit and offering to reimburse the extracted funds πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ