Thanks. Do you think “in code” wd be better than “in person” for verification of the same data points?

IMHO a crowdsourced solution (allowing people to “verify” each others names and pfp) allows erroneous claims (from a single person) to be ironed out by the claims from others. I imagine this wd be easier to implement and to maintain and produce better results than an algo (a black box for many) locked in code.

Your thoughts?

(ICYMI that screenshot above is a false positive.)

In your screenshot the profile picture of Ranger looks very different though, could be a very old cached false positive from back when there were code errors if you have been using Nostur since back then, or the pixel checking still needs improvement.