Hey Nathan,

Is this NIP more or less stable now? Should we expect to have changes to it yet?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Another question. In the event 31871, what's the "d" tag for?

Needs to be addressable and replaceable to support revocations.

I did have revocations as a separate event to begin with, but was steered this way to keep it simpler and have a single event representing the current state.

Ah! Of course! What was I thinking? Thanks!

Pretty stable I think, especially the basics. Tweaks expected as clients implement and we learn what we got wrong.

It would be something like this:

Nice.

Love seeing this!

nostr:nprofile1qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcprpmhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qqsvfa085adgecmg84ffelcxx6zrn3ffu5jrc6cjtwng0zge3ptv43c5xzlap was great listening to you on PCR.

Eager to implement on Zapstore

Hey Nathan!

Do we have an "oficial" nip for this Attestations spec?

Not in the merged sense.

Community NIPs are the repo now.

Maybe it gets merged one day, but I think the protocol can be more emergent now.