IMO from a privacy standpoint it's probably better using nostr only for public communication. If someone wants to carry about a truly private conversation I'd rather use an encrypted DM to set up an actual peer to peer channel that isn't broadcast to the world and use that instead. No point storing the events for everyone else to see even if they can't decrypt them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nah I still want a signal replacement on an open protocol. nostr having this would be huge.

The reason why signal is so popular is easy and reliable asynchronous comms. I don't believe you can achieve this with a p2p stack. At least with a signal-level ux.

Could it be part of the protocol that relays only send encrypted messages if they know the person receiving is the intended recipient? In that sense the relay is behaving more like a private server and should solve any privacy concerns.

I feel this should be pretty easy to do (theoretically at least), when you ask for DMs prove ownership of your private key and then the relay only responds with DMs sent to the corresponding public key

Looks like this is pretty much the proposed NIP-21 I guess

p2p will be added to nostr apps