https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mp-materials-rockets-17-after-trump-admin-mulls-prioritizing-us-based-rare-earth-projects

rare earth minerals, required for high magnetic permeability motors for drones and for parts of various kinds of electronic components are far more important than uranium

reading this https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2 i am definitely becoming convinced that the entire nuke thing, probably just like the moon landing thing, are propaganda tools and that all the "evidence" was your classic scientific hoax style staged, and simulated, and were in actual fact achieved using much more mundane technologies and for which reason there still hasn't been a terrorist nuke attack. since after all, all of the science is available, and the problem with the entire field of explosive nuclear fission has a severe problem of replication, which in any other subject of science would be a red flag of hoax.

drone warfare is the end game of modern warfare, but in order to do it, you have to be able to build stuff like the computers and displays you are reading this post on. and this is also why there is so much money in the AI research and why they are pumping it so hard, because even with all those neat-o motors and control circuits, the crucial thing that the drone has to do is behave like a kamikazi pilot, hopped up on meth, times a thousand.

the current arms race is about this and just to relate it back to what just happened in Tehran, Iran is a leading producer of drone technology. those persians are pretty good at math and computer programming, which is the magic sauce for drone war tech.

It was really interesting living abroad because I got that impression myself. I was raised in military culture and the rah-rah we've got the biggest bombs and we won the biggest war we spreading freedom.

In Estonia I really learned how much the Soviets did to really win WWII. I learned how we had already been destroying cities in Japan with carpet bombing and it was likely the possibility of a Soviet invasion on Japan that was the true deterrent. It was really interesting, because the folks who were telling me all this super hated the Soviets for many reasons but they still wanted to vindicate them in my eyes because the death toll was so much for them and then we took all the credit.

It's very interesting to think the nuke might be a hoax. I'm still not 100% sold on the moon landing being a hoax though, so the nukes being a hoax is hard to swallow. But your points are valid and make a lot of sense.

October Sky was one of my favorite movies and it came at a time when we started doing rocket studies in class and I just loved the idea that someone from the Appalachian hills could knuckle down and do such amazing cool work. I felt proud of us landing on the moon, or having excellent rocketry, and it was a big part of why I studied so hard and have done as much as I've done. If the myths I set my aspirations around were hoaxes, I would feel very sad and cheated.

Often when we talk about hoaxes of any kind I have to just accept that I won't know, will likely never know. I just have to think of what story to tell myself to keep a positive mindset and to keep being productive and helpful to my community.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

well, it's a good read anyway, and i've also penetrated most of the nonsense of the HAARP and woodpecker array stuff, and the chemtrails... all of them hyped and big budget military secret experiments that didn't work out to be very useful and instead became fodder for propagandists.

i'm inclined to say that underlying all of this is that probably to some extent, the potential for nuclear power to replace carbon fuels is also quite improbable, sure, the tech works and all that, after all, relatively pure uranium emits a lot of radiation which heats things up, but that has been kept from growing into an indutry by exactly the same thing that makes people afraid of The Bomb - a lot of elaborately crafted stories backed by a plausible amount of actual activity but the real goal of the operation was raking in government money to pay for the exhorbitant lifestyles of the criminal elites running these big corporations... and in reality, all they are really doing is running cover for a project to basically kill as many people as possible, even though none of their wealth would be worth anything without us to make the stuff they are strutting around with

first rule of war is if you are small, make yourself seem big, if you are big, make yourself seem smaller than you are. propaganda is the main weapon, and then after that is men with knives, bombs and rifles, and planes with rockets and bombs

the real enemy is humanity, and bamboozling people into doing insane shit is straight out of Jonestown

I will check it out when I have the emotional bandwidth!

right now i have need of more house cleaning and kitty food preparation bandwidth lol.

btw, this is a great read... just read a quote from Kurt Vonnegut's book Slaughterhouse Five, in which he describes the destruction of Dresden in WW2.

this was a fire bombing, not explosives but primarily high temperature oil based with explosive priming and hard shells to make a maximum amount of pressure before it bursts, they call them "saturation bombs".

these cause huge fire storms where there is so much heat that everything made out of wood nearby is basically carbonised to charcoal and the air is so turbulent from the pressure effect from the heat that it forms tornadoes briefly, sucking loose objects even as big as people into them to be carbonised.

after the quote from that book, it explains how most of the things associated with "nuclear" bombs is exactly the same as a saturation bomb, it's just a really fucking big saturation bomb, the nuclear part is propaganda. at most they may put a bit of uranium into it to make sure that geiger counters get happy because the usual main thing that uranium, and plutonium do when you smack them together is they liquify and then boil into vapor, which of course will then spread around everywhere with the turbulent fire that is the actual weapon.

this can even happen without radioactive material just from a mostly silica/metallic object like a meteorite, you may have heard of the "Tunguska Incident" or idk what it was, event... a large area of forest in siberia was blasted by some mysterious explosion - what it was was a meteor that flew past at a very low angle, and before it hit the ground it exploded, likely due to trapped gasses inside it that eventually built up so much pressure they blasted the rock apart that was at incredible (like 10k celsius) temperatures, and this then combines with the heat effect on all that carbon fuel sitting there in the forest, which then starts a combustion chain reaction, and it flattened several square miles of the forest to the ground, and blew down much of the forest for miles around that initial blast radius

nothing magical about fire bombs but they are just a natural phenomena being used by maniacs to kill people and a whole theatrical production was made that these very large fire bombs they made were made out of super secret technology that was in fact never really tested, didn't even have a decent integration test, and then supposedly it just worked the first time, and while that was happening, the supposed first nuclear bombs, the ones dropped on japan, were already en route to be loaded on a bomber and used to incinerate japanese people even though the emperor had already decreed they were to surrender.

i'm convinced now after reading this that stupendous amounts of the mythos around nuclear power and the space program has all just been a cover for funding much worse things like uranium tipped bullets and chemical weapons and biological weapons.

like even right now, why do you think that they are pumping AI so much? because they need as many investors to get suckered in as possible to bring the technology to the point where they can make drones the size of a mobile phone that can selectively kill people and target precise soft points in infrastructure.

probably the entire major stories of the whole of the 20th century are based on military plans. even the big highways and the auto industry and the way they are basically eliminating trains everywhere except ... trains are safer, quieter, cost less to build and maintain and are easy to electrify so they don't produce a lot of pollution around the residential areas they pass through. unlike cars. which stink, are noisy, the roads are more expensive to build, require more material and break faster, and kill more people. actually you can point at the boom in air travel in the last 20 years or so as probably being promoted to empower military industrial purposes too. because i'd rather travel across the ocean on a boat, myself. and on land, in a train, and when i get out of the train, i ride my bike back home, or even walk.