I bet Saylor jumps in bed with Tether too, like Rumble. indicator: he's been saying "digital assets" and not Bitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

His last interview he suggested moving tether to the US, have Bitcoin back the bonds, and tether become the CBDC

then definitely.

He wants tether in the US competing with banks issuing stablecoins backed by US treasuries.

Stablecoins = digital currency

Bitcoin = digital capital

How he’s been framing it

Hrm. competition is good? lots to unpack on that one

Yeah. If you’ve read Mark Goodwins Bitcoin-dollar thats how I think he sees things unfolding

he’s using this language to appeal to everyone.

Tether owns more Treasury bonds than Germany. Ultimately buttressing Bitcoin price while ensuring that the bond market doesn't collapse. Just like the Medicis and Credit that lead to the Renaissance, Tether > MSTR in the grand scheme of adoption.

MSTR should start the first US corporate Fedimint. 🤔

That would be cool, but Saylor doesn't strike me as a privacy guy

All part of the game until such time as the btc price is $10/sat. At this point who wants dollars? Until that time, the fiat ponzi scheme requires an engine for growth. In other words, an asset that is a vehicle for new money creation/debt. Bitcoin is pristine, liquid collateral. I think this is the path to a bitcoin/sat standard. At $10/ sat fiat is finished.

I've been saying it for a while, saylor is not a good actor.

yes. rational. but not good for freedom.