Every system is hackable because whoever hacked it had more time to think about how to hack it than whoever designed it to avoid being hacked.
It is an asymmetric relationship.
Discussion
the designer made a mistake if a system is hackable: they made it too complicated for them to consider all the permutations of the attack surface
the attacker has plenty of time once the device is in the wild
simplicity is one of the most important and least respected elements of a secure system
it's also one of the things that makes me disagree with most of the language systems in existence right now, because they are excessively complex, it's a problem that is creeping into even Go's almost perfect simplicity
Unless it’s purpose is to be hacked
I think a #mainvolume issued license is required to think. I think I am European, Swedish in fact. I think I am created by Sina for mainvolume.com
Simplicity is what allows the Kalashnikov to work so well.
#m=image%2Fgif&dim=200x120&blurhash=i7Am3hIo58%7EVr%3D57of%251NHNGxtIpM%7C-oe.Ipt7WB9%5Dn%25-oIpIo-pbHIo%252ELof%251WBNHs%3AxZNGR*XSafoLWBj%5Bj%5Bf6j%5BWV&x=25f2b01c971a90a8a3d8afef992c15b223a715e2de0b70ca631e61776b078105
At some point corporations will realize the excessive risks that come with hoarding (customer) data. Borrowed data should never have been booked as assets when in fact they are liabilities.