>my core heuristic is that if my hot takes are so dumb, repetitive and out of scope the other person uses language i don't like, i've won.
i gave good answers and you replied with nonsense. obvious troll
Discussion
No. I just see the risk:use ratio and a LOT of us are in the same view. Your analogies were about Air missles, Playstation and credit cards.
I appreciate your effort but speak about the code changes directly without jargon maybe? Or articulate WHY it's even needed. Sidechains and L2 seems decent enough.
My repeated point about it being the hardest money ever created was illustrating that something incredible has been invented. And it's working! If we implemented every gOoD iDeA to come along the Bitcoin would be Solana or Shiba Inu.
Bip300 isn't a small change and augments the use case considerably.
Maybe Drivechain *is the bees knees but yeah, yelling and name calling gives off Bcash vibes.
Bitcoin doesn't need to change to allow in/out 'trustless' escrow so shitcoins can exist on it in this manner.
And if it does you're doing a bad job of explaining it.
Your analogies were about katanas and swiss army knives and melting gold. I met you at that level of description.
What do you mean by side chains are Decent enough ? DC allows sidechains without damaging bitcoin. If you support lightning and liquid, you support DC.
What do you mean by risk:use ratio ? The risks are quantized and the uses are unlimited so your ratio is n:8 which is nonsense.
>Maybe Drivechain *is the bees knees....
Oh, i see, you are from the 1800's. No wonder you are so lost. These fancy electric gramaphones in your hand are pretty gosh darn neat huh ?
> Bitcoin doesn't need to change to allow in/out 'trustless' escrow so shitcoins can exist on it in this manner
If the shitcoin exist on bitcoin with DC, what are they escrowing in and out of ? This what i mean you don't understand DC or even basic sentences strung together. Just stay out of commenting on bleeding edge issues, or read more and be less dismissive of proposals you don't actually understand.
If you had at any point said something useful or indicated the ability to understand new concepts, i would not have used "bad" words.
Dc is not a popularity contest, its a technology it doesn't care if you or anyone else have good feelings in your tummy about it.
It stands on its own merits and not the soothing public blowjob ability of anyone talking about, it does not fall because of vested interest promoting the boring catchphrases and dead mental memes you keep using that are not arguments against DC.
It's also not that I just don't like your language. I'm just not about name calling and swearing at ppl with different views. Twitter is more that vibe tbh.
And I find usually people do this when they've lost an argument and have no other rebuttle or explanation and are triggered someone else has a different view. 🤷♂️
I have plenty of rebuttles. This conversation devolved into flames because of switching apps and reading the drivechain FAQ you replied dumb shit i had just answered.
Behavior like that is worth insulting. Seriously stop replying and read something more than 140 characters.
Instead of *
Haha. Opened Twitter and saw this.
Saifdean is a grifter. A very smart and quick witted economist. He's like the person i was fucking at the time when bitcoin came out and said "Well the state will just buy up all the bitcoin and control it." But far less attractive and far worse tits.