When it says Exodus, it doesn't mean physical Exodus. It means Agorism

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:nevent1qqsxzft68mtun2lxq8a5dpw6gc0uw0zf83uykmhlmrcnckjaeapx5wcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7q3qc856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsxpqqqqqqz73uqxk

The promise of the Kingdom of God under Christ is a direct ontological inversion of the system of egoism. Where egoism derives order from the assertion of self over others, Christ’s Kingdom derives order from the death of self and the emergence of the eternal Logos as the basis of authority, justice, and relational alignment.

---

⬛ I. The System of Egoism

Egoism, whether in its rationalist, objectivist, or anarcho-individualist forms, asserts:

The self as primary epistemic and moral unit

Authority as emergent from will or strength

Volition as the measure of legitimacy

Value as subjective and negotiated

In economic or agorist terms, egoism maps onto:

Voluntaryism absent ontological truth

Polycentric order absent covenant

Sovereignty without sanctification

It births systems that are anti-coercive but not righteous.

They may avoid domination, but they do not establish shalom—the integrated peace and justice of the Kingdom.

---

⬛ II. The Kingdom of Christ

Christ’s Kingdom introduces:

Self-abandonment as the beginning of freedom

> "Whoever loses his life for my sake will find it." (Matt 10:39)

Truth as Person, not proposition

> "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life." (John 14:6)

Justice as covenantal coherence, not individual assertion

> "Not my will, but yours be done." (Luke 22:42)

This Kingdom does not reject order—it reverses its source.

It is not built on egoic exit, but on exodus by obedience.

---

⬛ III. Interfacing Exit and Agorism with Christ’s Kingdom

If agorism is the operating system of voluntaryist “exit,” then in Christ’s Kingdom:

The exit is from Egypt, not simply the state

The economy is oikonomia—the house-law of the Father, not market valuation

Sovereignty is not personal autonomy, but being placed rightly under the Lordship of the Risen King

System of Egoism Kingdom of Christ

Self-sovereignty Christ as sovereign over all

Value negotiated through preference Value conformed to divine will

Justice as non-aggression Justice as fulfillment of covenantal righteousness

Liberty as absence of coercion Liberty as alignment with Truth

---

⬛ IV. The Implication for Counter-Economic Action

Counter-economics under Christ is not egoic withdrawal. It is prophetic construction:

Create parallel structures, not for freedom alone, but for faithful stewardship

Withdraw from Babel, not in fear, but in obedience

Reject the beast, not because it is inefficient, but because it worships itself

Agorism becomes sanctified when it is:

Grounded in righteousness

Directed by the Spirit

Oriented toward the New Jerusalem, not a sovereign homestead

---

⬛ Final Position

Christ’s Kingdom does not invalidate agorism.

It transfigures it.

What was once self-rule becomes co-rule under Christ.

What was once counter-economy becomes kingdom economy.

What was once exit becomes exodus.

The Kingdom is not the abolition of liberty.

It is the liberation of liberty from ego.

My argument still stands. Ruby ridge, the people that try to sell raw milk, etc: a parallel economy (agorism) will trigger crackdowns once it hits a critical mass that threatens the fiat regime. We NEED to build that parallel freedom economy (and we should, since it will outlive the regime so long as we can defend it). But I don’t delude myself that such a Revolution will or could be bloodless. Build the infrastructure, sure. But best be armed and coordinated enough to defend it when the fiat wolf feels cornered too.