So swan is not a Bitcoin-only company after all.

All talk about first principals and yet they always go ahead with fiat/gov compliance instead of working around or fighting it.

I thought they'd transition but it seems like they were always playing the fiat game and not the bitcoin game.

Swan is fiat-only. Period. Building uncensorable, privacy-default businesses is tough but there have been great efforts that need more recognition.

Azte.co & nostr:npub15369wu3wzzar5fclhecyqfv683x69n6nhlg7rxqnsg2dydgxflpq3apswl & nostr:npub1p2psats79rypr8lpnl9t5qdekfp700x660qsgw284xvq4s09lqrqqk3m82 are operating from first principals, require no personal details and are always building in the direction of becoming less controllable, governable and open by building open source technology stacks and embracing open protocols like nostr.

I liked them because they hired the best minds but apparently it's all for fiat marketing and not fighting the good fight.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yep, you got a point there. Would be more genuine to see an attempt to resist the dangerous KYC train rolling our way in every sphere of life. Similarly I don't understand why the bulk of Bitcoin maximalists easily accept #Tether as a giant centralized stablecoin provider.

I may add the #Sovryn project building on #Rootstock who are trying to build KYC-free finance onto Bitcoin, including a decentralized USD stablecoin #DLLR.

But fiat on- and off-ramps like Swan will always have to walk that fine line between freedom and mighty regulation.

Gotta love these cucks ❤️